Thursday night Phish took the stage at Madison Square Garden for the second of four shows to close out 2011. After a first night where most people had very warm reviews, the second night seems to be a bit more puzzling. After a series of passionate emails among staff here at Phish.net last night fits somewhere comfortably between "amazing" and "frustrating." I mean, we certainly used both words with great frequency but upon further review it's hard to pick which end of the level has more weight. I can probably name more "good" moments than "bad" but for some reason I'm left feeling a bit conflicted. Why is that?
What worked:
Well, the show sure got off to a raucous beginning. After Wednesday night's show opening "Free", the follow up of "Sloth" will put a smile on even the most jaded vets face. It's power and whimsical nonsens-ery is so not the "AC/DC", "KDF", "Possum" that often starts the show. But the real fireworks came in the second slot, when out of nowhere the opening notes of "You Enjoy Myself" rang out. Pure elation filled the arena and surely the homes of most people on the webcast. The former staple of Phish's catalog has been reduced to only 5 appearances this year and furthermore, lessened into an exercise of the ordinary and expected. But both this version and its predecessor in Chicago can put hope in the hearts of many that YEM is beginning to rise again to glory. Certainly far from the most legendary of its performances, this version once again found Trey engaged and extending the guitar based portion of the jam instead of dropping his instrument to ground for a dance routine in the drum and bass segment. YEM is and will always be the magnum opus of this band so seeing a sparks in its performance is a very, very, very good thing.
Also, Page was an absolute monster in that first set. His solo in "Funky Bitch" really carried the version into notable territory and provided some nice contrast from the standard guitar firepower.
In the second set it was all about the silky transition into "Lifeboy" and the phenomenal "Mike's Groove." Echoing the sentiment of the earlier "YEM" the second set's highlights focus once again on what once was old becoming new again. "Lifeboy" a staple request among many long time fans is akin to getting a postcard from a girl you kissed at summer camp. You immediately remember how awesome and beautiful they were and wonder why you force yourself to live without them. Most shows get some serious shit at any inclusion of a ballad, but "Lifeboy" is a perfect example of why they can be so precious. Even the later inclusion of "Show of Life" was a great example of using the tempo of a song to control emotion. Plus, it wasn't gonna be the encore on this night, so extra points there.
Following the second set Guyute, I don't think I was alone in hoping for that epic "David Bowie" from 17 years earlier to materialize and blow the roof off MSG. It's funny how we hold on to these moments in the past and hope that they will recreate themselves somehow. Silly really, but maybe it's akin to chasing that first buzz or that first kiss that you've long forgotten the sensation for. Ironically, what did follow was "Mike's Song." The song that gets little modern day respect because of the omission of that much sought after "second jam". You want it, I want it, we all want it, and for some reason until it happens, "Mike's" kinda sucks. Needless to say, it didn't happen on this night either, but what did happen was a ripping jam segment led by Trey that evoked hints of great versions from years past. Pure energy, pure guitar, awesome stuff. And as the collective sigh let out upon the end of "Mike's," Trey went immediately into "Chalk Dust Torture" to catch everyone by surprise. Continuing the fire from the previous number, "CDT" pressed on at a furious pace until suddenly, at full speed, Trey began to play the riff to "I Am Hydrogen." Now, on a technical scale this is probably the equivalent of the much maligned "DWD -> Sand" from Hartford in 2010, but the resounding opinion on this example is much more positive. Trey took a huge leap and somewhere between the band being on completely different pages and coming back down to the proper tempo, there's a pretty cool moment. But, upon further review it's a lot like a really huge belly flop. Impressive, but certainly a little painful.
Finally, there's the "Weekapaug Groove" that closes the 27 magnificent minutes out. Probably the best version since the band's reunion in 2009, if not since 2000, it is a perfect example of the song's power and greatness. Starting from some playful riffing and interplay and building from a staccato opening stanza, the jam grows in both speed and fervor until its climactic peak filling the room with pure energy. This is the kind of Mike’s Groove you should want every day of the week and twice on Sunday. Even without the second jam.
So? What’s there to gripe about? That sure reads like a lot of praise to me. Replay of Alpharetta this is not.
What could have been better:
Polish and flow. Outside of the two opening songs, the entire first set is hurky jerky ride that stops and starts with an overall tempo that just doesn’t seem to jive. After “YEM,” “Get Back on the Train” felt like a new show was starting, not building on one that’s already going. Join that with the rollercoaster of “Maze,” “Roses Are Free,” “Halley’s Comet” and something just felt off. We’re talking about highly critical and technical points here, but the difference between a really great show and an ok show exists in these details. But on a night like last night the current practice of playing from a list of songs in whatever order the mood strikes, seems to be limiting the final output. If the band spent 30 minutes writing down a composed setlist before the show and preparing mentally and physically for that would a better show appear? This band is so fucking good that they can pretty much play anything they want at any moment, just because they are that good. They can walk onto a stage for soundcheck and create improvised music that is as powerful as it is seemingly effortless. Continuing with the previous diving analogy, there’s a reason why Olympic judges operate the way they do. Because when you’re that good at something you need to be judged on the smallest details, it’s just how you define true greatness. So do these minuscule nicks create a “bad” show? Hell, no. But it does separate it from a truly great one. That’s why divers climb out of the water shaking their heads sometime when it all looked good from home.
The first two shows at MSG have some amazing high points. They are quite numerous in fact. With December 30th being a definite night of greatness in Phish lore, this may just be the night the judges have very little to gripe about.
If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
and instead play:
Twist> Slave To The Traffic Light. E: Frankenstein
there would be nothing wrong with this show.
spot on. great assessment of the night.
I do hope we get a Nadia Comăneci night tonight: Tens across the board!
It is hard to sometimes try to remember that these guys are human. I am not sure if prep for these types of shows happens or not. You would have to believe that there is a setlist of somekind - But the flow of a show and the songs that come with it can change with the energy, we have all felt it. They do too. The UIC show is prime example when 'Timber' was supposed to happen and 'Undermind' happened instead. The set is legendary either way, would that be the case if Timber did happen?
We, individually, may always be chasing that NEXT 'ONE' perfect show.
Anyways, still a good show and thanks for the excellent read.
You are conflicted becuase YOU can no longer have fun.
How about a review instead of an opinion?
p.s. an extra 2 cents... it makes such a difference when Trey is relaxed. I think he needs to loosen up somehow pre-show. BJ's? We know booze and benzos are out of the question.
First Phish show around 1990/91 in Somerville, Mass. Previous Phish Show: Fenway Park.
Consider myself adept musically.
Impressions of show: Class venue (goes without saying). 16th row center orchestra (thanks online lottery).
Many theories of art postulate that art rotates in cycles. First there is the development of a theme, then its perfection, then its attenuation. I saw Phish at Lemonwheel and It and many other shows (probably 20 or 30 in all), and what I saw last night was simply extraordinary. Phish has reached the "baroque" period in their development where, having "perfected" their art, they actively seek to "attenuate" it, that is, draw out or emphasize certain elements for special attention.
Last night the beat was slightly syncopated, everything was held back or twisted in the most ephemeral or slight degree possible. They evinced perfect control over their instrumentation and the sound, from where I was sitting, was phenomenal, simply sonically perfect. My impression as they were simply toying with the audience last night (the 29th). Song selection was relatively unimportant, I did enjoy the Back on the Train, Simple was good and Show of Life heartfelt. But they were simply fucking with our minds Thursday night, was my impression. They could have done anything they wanted, and instead they subtly, cohesively and monomaniacally altered their "perfect" sound to produce something that was sheerly delightful, it was so masterful.
One of the best Phish shows I have ever seen. I felt it was absolutely perfect in every regard. I listened very attentively, barely moved, kept my eyes directly on the band who were about 30 feet from me. Spectacular, astonishing performance. They were holding back and it was obvious, but they were doing it on purpose and it came off as sheer brilliance.
My impressions, as someone who has played, studied and attentively listened to all sorts of rock and roll for the past 35 years.
Congratulations Phish. You hit the nail on the head.
ps an afternote. There were times they "dropped the ball" and let the rat out of the maze. The ending of Maze was once such moment, Weekapaug another, so was parts of Halley's Comet. But the people who are "kvetching" that they weren't up to snuff may be missing the "fact" that a lot of the "misses" were deliberate, in my opinion.
Also, you should go back and actually read what was written, because you are writing your own script.
- Only the second Sloth opener since '91 followed by a finely placed and clean played YEM (last slotted here in '04). The 1,2 punch is perhaps my favorite slot for set 1 - approved!
- Crosseyed-> Simple-> Lifeboy. A puntual (and perhaps discussed before CE&P) drop into Simple. Above average, up-tempo, Simple jam faded finely into a bold and beautiful Lifeboy. C> S> L wins employee of the day IMO.
- Mike's Groove. Took the show exactly where it needed to go when it needed to go here. Although sloppy from Chalkdust -> H20, the review says it best: "Trey took a huge leap." This should always be applauded and is very important anymore for Phish 3.0. Kudos! Weekapaug sinks the jumper for the win!!!...wait, there is still time on the clock?...uh-oh :-l
Ive found that this is often the case on phish.net. when people critique (not criticize) the band, the younger fan often seems to take it as a personal attack. it would be nice to have in depth conversations about the technical aspects of a phish performance, but this will never happen until the reader stops getting offended. when we get offended we tend to hear what we want to hear, which is often light years away from what was actually said. we twist peoples words around to the point where the conversation evolves from a show review into a defensive message board battle. its frustrating and it has pushed many intellegent phish.net users away from the board.
i think you gave an honest, indepth review and i, for one, appreciate it.