The date December 29 has historical significance to Phish fans. Back in 1994, the New Year's Run followed a magnificent fall tour that had seen the band deepen and extend its improvisations, learning to move quickly and sometimes abruptly from one idea to another, from one riff to a variation to chaos to deep space and then back. The month between 11/12/94 at Kent State and the end of the tour in particular featured consistently sophisticated and exploratory second sets the likes of which Phish had never been able to deliver before. After taking a couple of weeks off for the holidays and a warmup the night before, Phish showed up on December 29, 1994 and emotionally demolished the ancient Providence Civic Center with possibly the most storied single jam in its history. As readers of this site know, the 35-minute, multi-part Providence "David Bowie" recently placed first in the Phish.net working group's (admittedly off-the-cuff and informal) poll of Phish's greatest jams. Even those (like me) who wouldn't rank it number-one have to acknowledge its immense significance and wondrous beauty.
That was the start of it, but Phish's December 29 exploits didn't end with 1994. The following year's New Year's Run is generally regarded as the best the band ever delivered. But although 12/31/95 is deservedly the pick of that run as a complete show, the best single moment of the run (and the most eloquent summary of what Phish learned on the road during its strongest touring year) was probably the transcendent "Bathtub Gin" -> "The Real Me" -> "Bathtub Gin" from December 29 in Worcester. And even as great as those high points from Providence and Worcester were, for the best single 12/29 set, you probably need to look to the masterful funk- and segue-filled second frame of the 1997 show at tonight's venue, Madison Square Garden.
On the one hand, if you're a glass-half-empty kind of person, you could point out that Phish hadn't hit those heights on any December 29 since that night 15 years ago. But it's probably worth using the other hand instead. The second leg of summer 2012 was at least a little bit of a fuck-you to people who have worried that Phish's best days are behind them, that they're not really challenging themselves, that they don't play together often enough to really maximize their ability to play together as a band, etc. These concerns are justifiable. But the stretch between Long Beach and Denver was Phish's best tour since June 2004, and maybe since the summer of the year before. Given that recent run of excellence, there was every reason to believe that Phish would show up big and sweep away everybody's bad memories of last year's dismal MSG run. Last night's show, particularly the colossal "Wolfman's Brother" and the second set bookends of "Tweezer" and "David Bowie," was a good start.
Well ... tonight was a lot more like December 29, 2011 than December 29, 1997. This is not a blanket condemnation of Phish in 2012 or a prediction that they won't deliver great shows the next two nights. But this was a below-average show even for 2012, with a good but safe first set and then a second set that felt like another first set.
Don't get me wrong, the first set was certainly good enough and you could see it leading to bigger and better things. (I watched the show on the webcast, in case you want to use that as a pretext for discounting what I'm about to say.) When I was a post-secondary student and complete dork in the mid-1990s, I wrote a long boring critical-theory post on rec.music.phish that had absolutely no influence whatsoever. It was called "Height and Width" and proposed the idea that there are two obvious ways to think about how good a show is. One is height, or the peak quality of the music during the show. Another is width, the overall quality, absence of low points, consistency of playing. What you think about tonight's first set, and whether you prefer it to last night's, broadly speaking depends on whether you put more value on peaks or on consistency. Last night's first set was pretty bad until the excellent "Wolfman's," and I wouldn't fault you for rating last night higher based on that alone. But I still preferred tonight's combination of (1) fail-safe first set tunes, like "Mound," "Sugar Shack," "Halley's," and "Reba" with; (2) tunes that usually show up (and often disappoint) in the second set, but are much more palatable in the first set, like "Rock and Roll" and "Limb" and "Wading." I don't think you can legitimately compare tonight's "Gin" to last night's "Wolfman's." This "Gin" brought some napalm, but only for a minute or so. It was the sort of short burst of intense energy that Phish can emit in its sleep. Overall, at just 10 minutes the "Gin" didn't see the kind of development we saw in last night's "Wolfman's," or in the 8/7/09 or 5/28/11 "Gins" that are the class of 3.0.
The other thing to note about the set was that a promising, slowly building "Reba" jam was completely undermined by the crowd, which for no apparent reason lost its mind and began screaming, eventually drowning out the band, who seemed confused. This "Reba" was slllooooowww, like the Lawn Boy version, and was developing a silky and narcotic texture before the yelling started. Who knows what Phish actually thought about it, but as a practical matter that was basically it for the "Reba" jam, which was Fishcorded shortly thereafter.
But ultimately, the takeaway from tonight's show is that the second set didn't really deliver anything after a promising first 20 minutes. The "Golden Age" opener gave us some nice major-key soloing before dropping back into the main riff and letting Mike Gordon have some shine on the bass guitar. When Trey reemerged, he hinted at "Sand" before the groove collapsed, leading Trey to start "Waves." I love "Waves." It's sort of a shame that, as a consequence of Phish playing many fewer shows than they used to, "Waves" has been heard only 24 times in its entire performance history, fewer appearances than "Reba" or "Bowie" used to make on a given tour. You wonder how it would develop with more regular play. This "Waves" had a speedy tempo and a short, exciting middle jam, but no real final jam after the last chorus, only a short ambient bit before Trey got bored and started "Prince Caspian." And after that there's really nothing to report, a short set full of standard versions of decent songs that didn't jam. There are some setlist notes we could discuss if you're into that. It was a good Saturday night out, but not the sort of show, and especially second set, that you'd hope to see Phish play on December 29 at the World's Most Famous Arena.
Before you angrily disagree with me in the comments: like I said earlier, it's just one show, and it was still an excellent rock and roll concert by anyone's standards. It just wasn't anything memorable by Phish standards, even for 2012 Phish. I will be tuned in tomorrow and I see no reason not to expect something more in line with Friday night than with tonight.
If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Consistency and energy were the name of the game tonight. There may not have been peak moments like the previous night's Wolfman's or Tweezer, but the energy was there from start to finish tonight.
I found it to be quite well composed. An interesting and unique setlist that kept the energy up and was more focused on getting off than on getting deep. But I take it as one night of a four night run, from a band that focuses on making each night so distinct that they might as well be a different band each night.
I personally thought the show was underwhelming (from the couch) as well. However, I have a feeling it was one of those shows that would've been real fun to be at with the high level of energy.
Anyways sorry again.
I suspect the fact that they failed Shack again got into their heads and was responsible for the almost freakishly slow Reba. I was still excited, though, because I thought a chill Reba could set up an extra chill chill. And when Fishman transitioned to rimshots I rose to my feet. But it didn't go anywhere special, and part of me took the crowd's subsequent freak out that then occurred to be a collective kick to the band's behind—almost saying, 'c'mon, let's get this show on the road.' (If it was simply a glowstick war, then I think it was inappropriate, except that it may have been a sign that the band had lost control.)
I thought there were some great glimmers thereafter, and generally feel like it was a bookends show. The only other perspective I'd add is how much the decision to kill Waves with Caspian bothered me. What a missed opportunity to construct something memorable! Again, good review and tonight holds plenty of promise.
I won't go so far as to call last night's Phish show disappointing. I got a face value ticket the day of and I danced till my knees were sore, but I could tell before the show was over that this was going to be a completely forgettable show. A fun rock concert for sure, but nothing that I'll come back to.
I actually think the band performed admirably given the very out-of-touch crowd response. At least twice during the show (during Reba, and I think Waves), the crowd started screaming for no apparent reason, and I think this really threw off the band. It's like the audience wanted the boys to ejaculate prematurely, and sure enough they did, time and again, spilling into big rock peaks in nearly every song. Problem was, each peak sounded the same as the last and only lasted for 45 seconds at a time.
To top it all off, the crowd was almost completely silent when Phish took the stage for their second set. I mean really, talk about showing enthusiasm in the right v.s. wrong places... I may be over-analyzing this all, but it really feels like the crowd didn't want or expect anything deep and thus were repaid with a very surface level show. I was feeling some of the same vibe on the 28th, but Phish played through it, giving us a broader range of musical offerings.
All that being said, the Golden Age > Waves deserves at least one listen. The Caspian had some decent trilling. Reba had a nice composed section, but a rather standard jam, with the whistling section starting 11:45 minutes into the tune. The encore was also really solid, with a nice spotlight on Page during Coil. The crowd went nuts when the band picked up their instruments again after Grind.
A high energy show for sure, but lacking considerably in substance. Definitely listen to 12/28 though, that show was great.
I think that the biggest thing here is that Phish is not playing fall tours anymore. The New Years runs suffer for it. I don't hold expectations for the next two shows, but hopefully they have at least one jam laden set.
I wouldn't go as far to say that last night was awful. The second set definitely lacked flow, but the playing was fine and they seemed to be having a great time up there. I think that people need to leave their stopwatches at home and just go with it. A 20minute version of a song does not automatically qualify it into Phishtory.
I still think that the first night (28th) was a fantastic show! Last night was a good show.
Keep the vibes positive and just have fun!
Happy New Year!!
A nod to Kuroda too, the lights - especially the background "space" look during Hailey's, the blue and turquoise during Waves and the Rainbow mix during 46 days were all beautiful.
Granted, I was not old enough to have seen them in the early 90's, and my first shows were in the few years prior to the hiatus, but what I've seen from them this year, including the last two nights has been great.
Maybe the web-casts are not doing justice to the shows, but the crowd energy was palpable and the show was awesome, if even just short of legendary.
Seems to me people want something specific that fits into the boxes of "Ok for first set" or "OK for second set" or "their supposed to play this way in the 2nd set" that they cannot enjoy whatever comes their way, whenever it comes their way.
If a song is enjoyable its enjoyable, no matter when it's played. If you're night can be ruined by song placement than you probably shouldn't bother at all because the band will do whatever they please and you'll still be waiting. I will never understand how the previous song makes a damn bit of difference to the current song, hence the term set killer.
Must suck to live that way.
1. Mcgrupp81 nailed it. no fall tour preceeding a NYE run absolutely affects the bands' chops/comfort level.
2. I still can not understand why 8.18.12 gets trashed here. BCG#2 was a totally solid show, and deserves a re-listen (ESP set 1) if you don't believe me. oh well
3. the random screaming during Reba appeared to be related to s glowstick war (webcast perspective)
carry on wayward sons (and daughters)
Did anyone hear the beautiful story that swirled through that 2nd set?
Does it always need to be heat and funk?
Why do we spend so much time complaining?
Why do we keep coming back for more?
I don't know about everyone else, but I truly feel like I got something special from the show last night; specifically during the 2nd set.
Was it just the drugs, or the lack there of..?
P.S. I'm not sure if this was revealed in this forum; but the roars that may or may not have sank Reba were caused by a massive onslaught of green glow sticks that erupted from the back right corner of the arena.
For Set II I went upstairs, took a PM sinus med and melted into my bed. I loved the Golden Age opener and the decision to run it into Waves, which as OP mentioned is sadly underplayed. At that point, I felt my cold slipping away and I lost track of anything and fell asleep. In slumber I do not recollect any type II jamming, ripcords, or Bieber sightings. However, I could not open my high school locker and whatever I was looking for in there felt really important.
Could not agree more! IMO, some folks think that the more negatively they critique a show, the more intelligent they seem or that it somehow "proves" they have great musical taste or something. What, do some of you guys have a PHD in Phish Studies from Phish University?
These negative comments sort of remind me of the character described in "Brian & Robert". What ever happened to surrendering to the flow? Or, as the Talking Heads once suggested, that we "Stop Making Sense"?
I like to hear people discuss the relative merits/demerits of the music i love, but some of the negative comments on here the last 2 days just sound like a lot of whining from people who've been spoiled by the riches that Phish has bestowed upon all of us for the last however many years we've each been following them. How lucky we all are to have something so wonderful to complain about!
As far as the cheering I thought it was strange but I definitely think it was because of a random glow stick war going on at the back of the arena ... plus the crowd was amped and ready to go off ...
Night 1 had more mistakes but had way more high points. Last night was fun but just that .. nothing worth downloading except maybe the Gin ...
Hope they rip it up tonight
the energy in the crowd was incredible. the reba "outburst" was just one of those "in the moment" type of reactions a group of people have when they collectively feel excitement. it didn't throw the band off. watch mkdevo's video on youtube. i was on the floor (west GA) and had no idea about the green glow stick explosion, but if that had something to do with it, it just added fuel to the fire already burning in the crowd. the gin was great. the Suzy had "more cowbell." the boogie-> suzy, while short, was groovin.
to me it seems as though (and this is not an attack on anyone), it's hard (near impossible?) to understand from your couch what the mood/energy (what-have-you) inside a building is unless you are there.
last night was better than people are breaking it down to be.
However, if one must engage in "ranking" the overall performance, doesn't the music deserve more than a one time listen/kneejerk reaction, especially if folks are going to throw around phrases like "best 3.0 version ever!" etc. ? Shouldn't the tapes be allowed to age a bit first?
and, conversely, i have been to shows where i remember being enamored by a jam and then on second, third, etc listen, realize it doesn't stack up to others. but that's the beauty (IMO) of being at the show. in the moment. on some level, the "as it's happening-ness" of a live show allows you to lose yourself in the music for a time, and not need to think of how it stacks up against other renditions.
Not sorry :/
Your idea of "Height vs. Width" got me thinking. The planar features versus the mountain building features as geology students might say. When you say 'low points' what do you mean? I guess this means to me, not so good, or 'less good'. This to me is a very different way of looking at a show, albeit a phish show. Not a bad way of course. Hi's and the lo's i guess is how most would interpret your ideas. I think you may be analyzing it a little too much, I really am not being negative in this statement. A phish show has to be a real stinker for me to not like it. two cents.
Listening to some of your high-brow criticisms is sort of like sitting in on Ivy League professors debate the merits of social welfare programs while choking on martini's.
That being said....who can resist the charm of it all?
But thanks for the write up - I found it interesting and helpful. I sat this one out totally on the couch tour and have a good idea how it went. Thanks for taking the time, but give 12/29/96 some LOVE damn it!
Sincerely,
Dosque
just my two cents
This was my 1st time in NYC, and will probably only ever be back for Phish. I was behind stage so I can say it would have been better to be GA or out front. Yes Gin could of jammed 5 more minutes.
The energy from the crowd was there except at 2nd set start,more energy at a nursing home. This band feeds off the crowd, give the love, receive the love.
Next year I hope to make new years, looking forward to next run, this band is blowing me away compared to the dead @ 30 years Safe travels to all
I was lucky enough to catch the first two nights of the run and for some reason have some large disagreements with many a persons view on the second night. The first night was a work of Phish genius. Amps were cranked up as all hell and my ears were ringing throughout the night following the show. I went with two buddies who ended up going to a DiscoBiscuits show after which I find to be completely mind blowing. Being 21 years old I never got a real chance to get into the band before 2004, however my father did in fact drag me up to Coventry for that last weekend of true Phish magic. Being a New Englander there is something truly mystical to me about Phish.
I felt as if the Friday show was a true performance similar to that of and Opera or Broadway show, if you webcasted you can have no idea. There seemed to be a large amount of rich New York banker types there with there exceptionally pretty girlfriends, and to me thats what the band was trying to get across, especially with the theme which wasn't my favorite at all but it made quite a bit of sense especially with the boxes upstairs lit up and with TVs on. No matter Fluff was the best I've heard and Page absolutely tore down the house with Maze> Twist. Moma Dance was my highlight of the first set but I'm always a happy camper when Trey lets loose on Kill Devil.
Onto night two. There seemed to be a fire in the crowd that night and possibly quite a few more doses in peoples bodies and minds. It seemed to me that the band was trying to truly engage the elder heads and get some sing songing going on but at this point the peeps with money to go to a NYR show seem to be younger and far less engaged in the scene, using it as somewhat of a way to be different but never really getting into the show, or knowing how to. I had to copp one of the cheaper tickets so I was at the far back of 214 diagonal to the back of the stage but honestly loved the spot, I had my jam space and wasn't burning up. The first set to me was a call from the band to get everyone truly engaged or even a question if its worth it for them to carry on further with their careers. To me Wading in the Velvet defined that question. I remember Coventry, my first show, where almost 60,000 phans were helping the band through an emotional song, but they made it. Page seemed to be keeping it low along with the rest of the band hoping for all of MSG to get on it and make some real magic, but it never came. I really did love this Saturday show even though it wasn't mind blowing, maybe it was the lights that seemed to be constantly asking the question "what do you expect from us?" Second set I made it down to the 100's front row and at Caspian I was so entralled I threw my hat into the crowd. Maybe next show I'll chill out on the L but this was one night to get yourself right and twisted. I think the problem with the band at this point really has to be the people going to shows. Either their jaded vets or younger kids getting into the scene post 09 and really not knowing what the band is all about. It befuddles me when everyone spanks their meat to '97, I have to say of everything I've ever listened to I wish I was back in 1994 getting down and following the band wherever they happened to go. I think this saturday show had the sloppiness of '94 but the magic of everything that came after. Could have been a better show but absolutely not a dud.
Peace and love,
RDL
P.S. I mean c'mon guys they staged a Runaway Golf Cart Marathon
Anywho, personally I thought 12/29 was a fun show. People talking shiz about the second set were probably not there. I'm someone who often complains about the lack of jams but that second set just flowed so nicely with LOTS of great energy. And no one wants to mention that 46 Days 1st set closer?!
Can we make a new rule that in order to blog a review of a show, that person had to of been at the show. Makes sense.