Regular readers of this site may have noticed that the admins did not post a “Best of 2016” this year, as we did the last three years. Delicate flowers that we are, 2016 took a lot out of us. For starters, it wasn’t 2015. That may be an unfair comparison, with 2015 being the consensus best year of 3.0, but it’s also the nature of the space-time continuum. So, fine, point conceded: it may be unfair to be critical of any series of shows for not standing up to the band’s most recent high water mark. But Summer 2016 paled in comparison to 2012-14, too. In fact, many of us viewed it as the most lackluster tour since the band’s first post-breakup tour in June 2009.
Fortunately, as lackluster as the summer was, the Dick’s run proved to be a turning point (if you squint a little, you could see the seeds for the turning point start with the west coast run). In fact, a group of us began ranking the 2016 shows and two things jumped out. First, summer really was that underwhelming. There were 45 shows in 2016. Only one show from among the first 25 so much as threatened to make it into the top 10 (7/15/16). The other top 10 contenders came exclusively from the last 20 shows of the year. But -- there’s always a but -- here’s the thing: those 20 shows produce a damn respectable top 10 shows. As good as 2015? Um, no. But when you consider they came from a 20 show stretch, you realize that Phish actually ended the year in quite strong fashion.
And yet we still couldn’t be bothered to produce a top 10 list. Why not? Who knows. Blame the Marimba Lumina. Or the LED panels. Or 12/31/16 III. Or maybe it had something to do with the ongoing malaise that set in after the 2016 presidential campaign (which tended to suck all the air out of the fact that just eight days prior Phish wrapped up one of the finest four night runs in their career). Or maybe we’re just lazy. Or old. But never let it be said that ol’ @lumpblockclod doesn’t give you your money’s worth. Here’s one person’s top 10 Phish shows of 2016: 1) MSG3 2) Vegas3 3) Dicks3 4) Vegas1 5) Nash2 6) Dicks1 7) Vegas2 8) ATL1 9) Vegas4 10) MSG1.
By now you may be asking yourself, “What does all of this have to do with the show Phish played last night at Chicago’s Bank du Jour Pavilion at Northerly Island?” Honestly, very little. But it saves me from having to write an introduction for the recap, and maybe it distracts some of you from the fact that I didn’t attend last night’s show. So, from the couch, let’s see how Phish fared in the second show of Summer 2017…
“Stealing Time From the Faulty Plan” kicks us off; certainly not as dramatic an opener as last night, it sticks to the script, as does the ensuing “Moma Dance.” It’s been 7 shows since the last “Moma,” and that qualifies as a reasonably large gap for the song. It hasn’t gone more than 9 shows without being played since 2.0. “The Wedge” is next and is always a welcome song to hear, but the band is still on autopilot. As Rick Pitino might say, “7/20/14 is not walking through that door,” at least not this set. If someone has something more insightful to say about this opening trio, I’d love to hear it.
“Halfway to the Moon” follows -- Thank you, @pagemcconnell! -- and I’m halfway to sleep. I apologize. I’m sure this recap strikes the great majority of you as overly negative -- and it probably is! -- but I’m just not sure who Phish is playing this set for in 2017. Sure, there are first-timers at every show, but it’s not like these are even the “greatest hits.” What I’m saying is I’d like to see the boys take the stage looking for a little more fun. But it’s still early, and Phish has been largely treating the first set as a warm up set since 2009. I should be used to this by now, and yet it still frustrates me that the band chooses to play only a handful of shows a year and then so often goes through the motions for half of those shows. I mean, I only write a handful of recaps a year, and these takes couldn’t be hotter. (NB: comparing my shitty little recap to even the worst of Phish shows is a joke.)
Few songs scream summer first set as much as “Ya Mar” and we get a gooey little Mike solo towards the end. Kinda fun? “Martian Monster” remains my favorite Haunted House song and the band is starting to show signs of life, with Trey playing some fiery little leads. The relative upswing continues with “Party Time.” We’ve reached fun, danceable Phish! Page announces his presence with some deft organ playing. If I were at the show I would be uncrossing my arms and removing the frown from my face at this point (NB: Also a joke; I have a great time at every show I’m fortunate enough to attend, honest).
“Wingsuit” has really grown on me, and is probably my favorite Fuego song. Alas, sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this one doesn’t really stand out. This is not to say it's not a perfectly fine version. It is… I just don't find Trey’s solo as stirring as, say, 7/12/14 or 8/7/15. You can probably guess my feelings about “Bouncing Around the Room,” but in this case you’d probably be wrong! The song is somehow welcome in this spot. A concise “More” closes the set in strong fashion, and I can't help but relate to the chorus. There's gotta be something more than this. Thankfully, there will be in Set II. (BTW, if you haven’t, you should really check out the Phish.net song history for “More” by Kelly D. Morris, particularly if, by this point, you’re looking for positivity.)
The Phish debut of “Corona” opens the second set. While it popped up in at least one soundcheck in 2013, it’s safe to say no one expected it here. The opener is short, but Trey sounds good. “Simple” follows, and fasten your seatbelts, everyone, it may just be time to go for a ride. This “Simple” heads straight for bliss territory after the verses. The bliss eventually gives way to a more general ambience, but still featuring some imaginative leads from Trey. He then steps back and we go from ambience to full blown space. Let the record show that at 10:36 p.m. EDT this jam could have died, and probably taken the show along with it, but Mike turns the jam on its head and it becomes a dark bluesy jam that is a bit “Tweezer”-y at first and then feels like it could drop into “Timber-Ho!” at any moment. The battle station is fully operational at this point, with Mike leading the way. The jam works its way to a major key peak, and then somehow keeps going. By the time it dissolves into “Winterqueen,” we have an all-time great version of “Simple” (for sheer length only two versions outlast this 27 minute monster: 11/16/94 and 12/9/97) that will surely be among the finest jams of the year.
The ‘Queen starts out spacier than usual, hinting at the possibility of an atypical version, but hints are all we get before Trey leads the others into “Light” (apparently before they were quite ready). The “Light” doesn’t stay on for long before slowly (and maybe a little awkwardly) seguing into “Scents and Subtle Sounds.” The “Scents” jam starts out in typical “Hood”-like fashion before downshifting to something approximating a 2011 “storage” jam. Things get dark, dirty and swampy and before we know it, we’re treated to a surprise late second set “Cities” (not to mention a much more successful segue). A seemingly short “Slave to the Traffic Light” recalls “Cities” in that there are some good points (it’s a “Slave” closer!) and some bad points (a few sour notes), but it all works out. Far be it for me to complain about a “Slave” closer, but let the record reflect that if I were in charge of setlist construction (a position I am available for on either a full-time or consulting basis), “Cities” would have ended the set. “Loving Cup,” the second Exile song in two nights, sends us home. Well, not me; I’m already home.
Remember all those awful things I said about the first set? DISREGARD! DISREGARD! I mean, they’re all true, but when they play a second set like that, they’re also largely irrelevant. This is why we go to see this band time after time, year after year. I started out this recap listing my favorite shows of last year. A quick, back of the envelope calculation puts last night on the top half of that list. Just imagine if they weren’t playing with one hand tied behind their back.
If you liked this blog post, one way you could "like" it is to make a donation to The Mockingbird Foundation, the sponsor of Phish.net. Support music education for children, and you just might change the world.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
Besides all that, 2016 had a constant upward trajectory, unlike say 2014 whose Summer tour peaked early at Randalls, followed by a Fall tour that was pretty much just a warm-up for Vegas. The quality of playing between most of 2009-2014 and 2016 is just worlds apart, I suggest you A/B a few random versions of the same tune and you'll be able to hear it instantly.
As far as your narrative that all the best shows last year were post-Dick's, I think you could easily replace about half of your list with earlier shows: Mann1, SPAC1, Mansfield, Hartford and BGCA2 are about as good as Nash2, Dick's1, ATL1, Vegas4 and MSG1...at least to my ears.
Anyway, I'm glad you like last nights show annnnd I am fully aware that you peppered your recap with enough self-effacing humor to make it somewhat more digestible. I'm sure you could accuse me of trying to stifle any criticism, but seriously do you think anyone wants to read all that in a review of a show that was as good as 7/15/17?
"Who is Phish playing this set for?" you ask in your, like, 5th paragraph. "Who is this review for?" is a more astute question.
Happy tour, though, I guess. Right?
Yes. YES!! Why is it so difficult for people to understand that there's a difference between how well they're playing and whether or not they're playing exactly what you as an individual want to be hearing at a given time?! Phish 2016 dropped a lot of songs into second sets that didn't belong there, but to me that doesn't negate the fact that the Mann Hood or SPAC Hood sounded more 1.0-esque than any they'd played thus far in 3.0. I think that sort of thing is significant, and I'm not sure if others don't hear that, don't agree, or if they're just emotionally clouded by the fact that they don't like Tide Turns
Wait. So not only are you reviewing a show you didn't attend, you're reviewing a show that wasn't even officially webcast? Did you listen to a fan stream, or did you just wait for it to pop up on LP?
No wonder your cold hot take intro has more substance than your actual review. JFC.
Pretty Spot On review IMO. Forgettable first set, Fantastic Simple and a great SASS -> Cities
The first set contains a magnificent, gorgeous version of "Halfway to the Moon," obvious to anyone with ears who isn't prejudiced against the song per se. Trey usually plays it rotely, almost like he couldn't give a shit at all whatsoever about it. But last night's version is soulful and charming, performed in a manner that I wish it were performed in every damn time they play it.
It's a MUST HEAR HTTM for fans of the song, of which I am one.
As for the second set "Simple" it, too, is MUST HEAR, of course, but you knew, or should have known, that already. If you haven't yet heard it, you need to listen to it as soon as possible, and with extreme prejudice.
$0.02,
charlie
I don't mind a negative or mixed review with specific evidence cited from the performance, like the comments about this set 1, but not for the first time, I do tire of all the narrative-shaping. Whether 2017 will be more like early 2016, late 2016, 2015, or 1994 couldn't possibly be extrapolated from 2 shows; the author appears to be setting up an improvement narrative for 2017 in order to consign 2016 to the dustbin of history... shortly after begrudgingly admitting that the 2nd half of 2016 was basically as good as 2015.
Publishing a full review of a show immediately is a challenge compared to a safe 'show recap' style like Jambase Setlist/Skinny pieces or an in-depth study with repeated listens, so I appreciate the effort and limitations of the hot-take format. Just skip the introduction! Reviews probably shouldn't follow a paragraph structure that awkardly combines an argumentative essay with a historical narrative, even though that default organization is one that I've also followed repeatedly simply because it is easier to write to. Still, that format invites excessive context and opinions about things other than the show itself, and creates the perception that the show is being reviewed through a particular filter, taking away from the credibility of the writer.
I'm not butthurt about the review... but if we are going to hold the band to super-high/semi-impossible expectations -- which we should! -- then we should strive for similar standards for ourselves, knowing that the constructive criticism is being respectfully offered in good faith. In scholastic journalism I edit/advise a fair number of reviews, and review writing strikes me as more of an art than a science: it is much easier to offer meaningful criticism than to do it yourself. Still, the front-pager tendencies toward narrative-shaping are best left until after tour, when we have perspective and have had the opportunity to listen to things more than once. IMHO anyway.
I don't mind negative reviews and there have been many shows that have a lack-luster set coupled with a stunning one. So I appreciate the honesty and eventual positivity.
One more thing, I kinda like couch tour reviews they are all about the music, not the atmosphere. We all know the atmosphere can change depending on your spot at the show so that should not be much of a factor.
Love and light y'all.
I also don't mind people writing show recaps from their couch. While I do think the best case scenario is for someone who was at the show because being able to actually see the band and the lights is part of the experience, I do understand the desire to get recaps up in a timely manner. So someone watching a webcast who is available to write about the show is perfectly acceptable.
But the person writing the recap is listening the show via a phan's phone? That's suboptimal. Hopefully it can be avoided in the future.
For example, my claims about the value of the Simple in relation to 4 other very long or very epic 3.0 jams are also trying to shape the narrative, and so maybe it is more accurate to say that I dissent from the narrative itself as a matter of substance and and from the review format as a matter of review writing aesthetics. I love that sort of dialog over interpretation and aesthetics, but it works better in forum threads and through things like the jam tournament than it does as an introduction to a particular show recap/review.
Let me put this way: I find the stock market ups and downs/trends approach to analyzing the historical direction of the band as an artistic enterprise to be boring and/or based on incomplete information. Attempting to put a show into historical context within hours is fraught -- and also unnecessary.
@Lumpblockclod
My post got speculative about the motives for the recurrent 'stock market style' analysis and if that felt like a flame I apologize. There is a wider trend of overwrought reviewing of which I found this to be an example, and it is really the trend in general and not this review in particular that I'm commenting on.
I hope that clarifies my position and I wish everyone to have a great day. I just listened to the Carini from last night so
And then Scents goes wild! The Scents > Cities segue is ace! Cities itself is nasty!
So Simple > Winterqueen > Light > Scents > Cities is an hour of risk-taking music, with every tune in that series going someplace interesting, and if two of the component tunes in that run are short, no big deal. Song lengths have been a lot less important since 2009 than they used to be, haven't they? Weren't we all going on 2010 or 2011 that they were doing so much with contained jams and getting to the point, etc. etc.?
I guess my point is: the review briefly touches on the post-Simple tunes, but they're interesting on their own terms and the whole set's worth listening to.
Thanks for the review, L.B. Clodsmith.
I liked a lot of 2016. 7/8/16 Light is one of my all time fav jams. And I've been a fan since ~97.
Am I the only one who thinks Trey is playing The Dogs as the rest of the band is playing Timber (Jerry) in that Simple? Pretty awesome moment, and all around jam.
I like HTTM. Always have. One of Page's better songs. Trey's guitar in it has a great tone. Love the foreboding quality. I don't really understand why people don't like it. Better, IMO, than a lot of Trey's recent Dadrock forays.
Also, let's remember how remarkable it is they are still a great band and still capable of new songs people actually like. The Dead around this time were disintegrating. I frequent Dead FB groups and so many ppl long for Jerry. I'm grateful we still have Trey.
Let's hold them to a high standard and appreciate them for what they are, particularly given where most bands are today that have been around this long.
"Sounds good, Mike!!"
If you're a sucker for seamless in-the-moment segues (like I am), the Light > Scents > Cities is worth checking out.
In the absence of a Chicago3 review (?), we all know the Carini went type II expedition already, but I actually found the Ocelot jam to be a highlight. Sometimes I prefer me a good type I jam to a type II, and this is a perfect example. Also, while I personally haven't really been diggin' the worked parts of any of the new songs, some of them have COOL jams: Like this THREAD here.....spooooky......
~Nigel