Permalink for Comment #1308592921 by BrotherEarth

, comment by BrotherEarth
BrotherEarth Totally Bogus Review. This should not be listed as show review. It is not. It is just an essay, obviously written in advance of the show, and manages to mention almost nothing about the actual show. The writers agenda comes through clear (Trash Phish 3.0), but there is little or no details about the actual show. If the writer watched or even listened to the show, he would have mentioned what happened in Suzy Greenberg, and the significance of the crescendo in Page's solo.

I've read reviews I've disagreed with before, some positive some negative, but there was at least some resemblance to the actual show. But, this is the first time I've ever read a supposed review in which I could not even recognize it as having anything to do with the show I saw.

Shame! Shame on Phish.net for posting it, and Shame on Jeremy D. Goodwin, a supposed communications expert, for phoning in an agenda based essay under the guise of a show review.


Phish.net

Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.

This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.

Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA

© 1990-2024  The Mockingbird Foundation, Inc. | Hosted by Linode