Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
You posted a negative blog in the space where phans expect a glowing review of a stellar Halloween show; of course you're going to get pushback!
Next time, let the review post first... or at least let the glow from everyone's evening wear off before buzzkilling. I actually agree with your sentiment, but I certainly don't think this should be the first thing everyone reads after THAT show. This is actually phish.net's fault, they should be employing the best editors money can buy to catch these issues I can see the headlines now: Phish signs contract with Youtube, Phish.net contracts with HuffPo